Winning justice in agriculture will require us to continue the multi-generational struggle for real freedom.
“The black revolution…is forcing America to face all of its interrelated flaws—racism, poverty, militarism and materialism. It is exposing the evils that are rooted deeply in the whole structure of our society. It reveals systemic rather than superficial flaws and suggests that radical reconstruction of society itself is the real issue to be faced.”
The present injustices of American agriculture have deep roots that reach back to the founding violence of colonization and nation-building. Paying attention to these roots not only helps to clarify what it will take to win justice on the land; it also anchors our movements’ current fights in the longer arc of struggles over land and labor. These movement traditions have long held that winning real freedom will require remaking US society on a radically more egalitarian and life-affirming basis.1
Agriculture has always been a front line in the US nation-building project, and its story must be told through overlapping histories that gave birth to different forms of racism and racial violence. One history is that of European settlement, making genocidal war on Native peoples and stealing their land.2 A second is that of chattel slavery, white supremacy, and the Southern plantation economy.3 A third is that of immigration policy, borders, and industrial farm employers’ continuing quest for control over their workers after the end of slavery.4 Through all of these histories run parallel threads of patriarchy, misogyny, and gender oppression.

“Northern Industry” and “Southern Industry” prior to the Civil War. Source: Scribner’s Popular History of the United States, 1896, Wikimedia Commons.
In each of these cases, Euro-Americans used violence and exploitation to secure others’ land and labor on the cheap, using ideas about race and difference to justify their actions. While most of the people who participated in this bonanza did not keep hold of the profits and were themselves exploited in turn, white men had citizenship, status, and—at least sometimes—property that offered them certain advantages and a modicum of economic security.5 The collective efforts of these unequal groups of workers produced super-profits for capitalists that were reinvested over and over again in new enterprises—agriculture, industry, trade, and finance—building a global superpower in the process.6 The various twists and turns that history took along the way were often guided by entrepreneurs’ endless search for more exploitable labor, cheaper resources, and bigger returns, with little regard for the human or environmental costs.7
The flip side of that wealth is a country wracked by “racism, poverty, militarism and materialism.”8 Compared with other industrialized nations, the wealthiest country in the world has some of the worst health outcomes and life expectancy, highest rates of poverty, and highest rates of violence; these harms fall heaviest on Black, Indigenous, and other people of color, as well as women and queer folks.9 These conditions are not just legacies of the past—they are actively maintained in the present by a multitude of laws and institutions put in place to enable profits for a few at the expense of the many.10 This includes a system of minority rule that allows white supremacist regimes in the Southern states to block or weaken popular reforms. It includes some of the weakest labor laws among industrial nations, laws that exclude farm and domestic workers from basic rights and—through the giant loophole of ‘at will’ employment—make all workers subject to the whims and retaliations of employers.11 It includes a massive police and prison state that cages more people than almost any other nation, predominantly poor people and people of color.12 It includes a vast, militarized border policing complex that terrorizes communities across the country—a massive subsidy to employers who want their workers as powerless as possible.13 It includes the overriding power of corporations across many domains: in labor markets that offer poverty wages and precarious work; in commodity markets that wring every drop of value out of small producers and households; and in markets for housing and health care that mine basic human needs for profit.

Braceros doing “stoop” labor in the pepper fields of the Firebaugh area, California, 1963. Credit: Los Angeles Times Photographic Collection, UCLA, CC-BY-SA 4.0.
All these institutions combine to immiserate regular people across our society—especially people of color and low-income folks—and the effects on farm people are severe. Industrial agriculture has depopulated, polluted, and impoverished farm communities.14 It has driven farmers from the land—especially farmers of color—and forced immigrant workers into hiding and constant movement.15 More than 150 years after the end of the Civil War, industrial agriculture has effectively spread the Old South’s racialized hierarchy of farm labor across the nation, so that today the vast majority of farm owners, managers, and supervisors are white, while manual laborers are overwhelmingly people of color—in large part immigrants from Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean.16 In a sense, our present situation represents a victory for Southern defenders of slavery, who in the nineteenth century claimed that “agricultural labor is the most arduous, least respectable, and worst paid of all labor” and predicted that “free society” would always be “dependent for its food and clothing on slave society.”17 From the cotton plantations of Mississippi to the vegetable farms of California, Florida, and Mexico, industrial agriculture has made this prophecy come true, as farm work today remains one of the most dangerous, most precarious, and worst paid of occupations. Our food system relies on various forms of compulsion to ensure that vulnerable people do this essential work.18 Yet this industrialization has not only degraded the lives of farm workers and farmers of color: it has rendered all farm owners subject to ruthless competition, hollowing out the middle class of farmers whose circumstances had once been relatively stable, forcing many farmers to exploit themselves and their families just to hold onto their land.19 Our society has devalued farming and the people who do it, with terrible results.
Despite these dire conditions, we also inherit traditions of unceasing struggle. For sustained periods, organized labor and populist farmer movements have waged courageous battles against domination by corporate capital. At their best moments, led by their left flank, they acted in solidarity across lines of race, ethnicity, and gender; but far too often white supremacy and patriarchy hobbled these groups’ vision and power.20 Against such failures of solidarity, movements have put forward visions of a radical freedom not premised on the subjugation of others.21 The Black freedom struggle especially has “harbored a deep vision, a dream of a democratic social order with unfettered access to political, economic and social rights, regardless of race, gender and class.”22 When oppressive institutions and reactionary backlash have repeatedly blocked African Americans’ demands for basic human dignity, the freedom movement’s diagnosis has been clear: our society’s flaws are “systemic rather than superficial,” and “radical reconstruction” of our laws and institutions is necessary.23 In Manning Marable’s words, “Racism and capitalist exploitation have been, and remain, the logical and consistent byproducts of the American political economy,” and if we want different results, we need to transfer “power to those members of society who generate all wealth.” 24

Formerly enslaved African Americans celebrate the Emancipation Proclamation in Virginia. Credit: Amand Jacob, Le Journal Illustré, 1865.
This perspective is crucial for farm movement strategy today. To borrow a metaphor, it is not enough to play within the rules of the racial capitalist ‘game’: winning durable justice will require us to change the game itself.25 That is exactly what movements did in the Reconstruction, New Deal, and Civil Rights (or “Second Reconstruction”) periods.26 We owe many of the rights and public goods we have today to their efforts, hard won in the face of fierce opposition. Yet the same reactionary backlash that cut short their victories in earlier periods has now captured much of the federal government and many state-level governments, and they are working to roll back basic rights to pre-Civil War levels.27
Today our movements must carry forward our ancestors’ “unfinished revolutions,” articulating our own demands for freedom tailored to present conditions.28 We need a Third Reconstruction that reinforces past wins and also goes further, undoing oppressive laws and institutions that have arisen in our own time. The path to a Third Reconstruction is daunting yet within reach. Past movements overcame the slow pace of reform not just because they were visionary or brave but also because they were big, organized, and strategic in their actions, taking advantage of the opportunities that history provided them. Our movements today are not there yet, but this moment of many crises presents an opportunity for growing in each of those ways.
We believe that farm people have an essential role to play in this work. The next phase of our long struggle for freedom and dignity raises issues that most people—including many farm folks—have barely considered yet. Farm people need to flesh out a vision for reconstruction in agriculture and bridge our fights to those of our movement allies more widely. At this moment, as communities across the country witness the brutality of immigration enforcement, many people will be newly open to abolishing the border policing complex which is the keystone of farmworkers’ oppression.29 But to abolish it in any meaningful, lasting way we need a broad effort to address both the racism and the economic precarity that makes scapegoating of immigrants such effective political theater, propelling the rise of figures like Donald Trump. We need to address the fact that corporations (especially industrial agriculture) are literally invested in the border as a tool for worker repression and imperialist exploitation. And in addition to labor justice, we need to bring people into a vision for food sovereignty: we need a program to replace industrial agriculture with agroecology and remake our relationship to the land.30 This work will require centering not just the Black freedom struggle but also Indigenous and peasant movements; it will require solidarity with immigrants in the US and people across the Global South.

Indian peasant farmers of the Bharatiya Kisan Union protest in 2021, blocking a road. Credit: Randeep Maddoke, Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA 4.0.
These goals may feel formidable compared with the weak state of farm movements in the US, but that’s why we need to expand our framework and grow our coalitions. Politicians and bureaucrats will not save us; there is no reform proposal to match the scale of the problems we face. It’s our responsibility, arm in arm with our peasant farmer allies around the globe, to bring people into a vision for justice on the land—and work towards it with all we’ve got.
Daniel Martinez HoSang, A Wider Type of Freedom: How Struggles for Racial Justice Liberate Everyone; Aziz Rana, The Two Faces of American Freedom; Robin D. G. Kelley, Freedom Dreams; Eric Foner, The Story of American Freedom. ↩︎
Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, An Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States. ↩︎
Edward Baptist, The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism; Manning Marable, How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America. ↩︎
Justin Akers Chacón & Mike Davis, No One Is Illegal; Don Mitchell, The Lie of the Land, They Saved the Crops: Labor, Landscape, and the Struggle over Industrial Farming in Bracero-Era California, and “The Geography of Injustice: Borders and the Continuing Immiseration of California Agricultural Labor in Era of ‘Free Trade’”; Cindy Hahamovitch, The Fruits of Their Labor: Atlantic Coast Farmworkers and the Making of Migrant Poverty, 1870-1945. ↩︎
As WEB Du Bois recounted in Black Reconstruction in America: “It must be remembered that the white group of laborers [in the South], while they received a low wage, were compensated in part by a sort of public and psychological wage. They were given public deference and titles of courtesy because they were white. They were admitted freely with all classes of white people to public functions, public parks, and the best schools. The police were drawn from their ranks, and the courts, dependent on their votes, treated them with such leniency as to encourage lawlessness. Their vote selected public officials, and while this had small effect upon the economic situation, it had great effect upon their personal treatment and the deference shown them. White schoolhouses were the best in the community…they cost anywhere from twice to ten times as much per capita as the colored schools. The newspapers specialized on news that flattered the poor whites and almost utterly ignored the Negro except in crime and ridicule” (pp. 700-701). ↩︎
Baptist, The Half Has Never Been Told; Sven Beckert, Empire of Cotton; Sven Beckert & Seth Rockman, Slavery’s Capitalism; Charles Post, The American Road to Capitalism; Richard Walker, The Conquest of Bread: 150 Years of Agribusiness in California. ↩︎
Raj Patel & Jason W. Moore, A History of the World in Seven Cheap Things. ↩︎
King, “A Testament of Hope,” in A Testament of Hope: The Essential Writings of Martin Luther King, Jr. ↩︎
Heather McGhee, The Sum of Us: What Racism Costs Everyone and How We Can Prosper Together; Selena Simmons-Duffin, “‘Live Free and Die’? The Sad State of U.S. Life Expectancy.” ↩︎
Marable, How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America. ↩︎
Kaitlyn Henderson, Where Hard Work Doesn’t Pay Off: An Index of US Labor Policies Compared to Peer Nations; Rebecca Dixon, From Excluded to Essential: Tracing the Racist Exclusion of Farmworkers, Domestic Workers, and Tipped Workers from the Fair Labor Standards Act. On ‘at will’ law as backlash to emancipation from slavery, see Lea VanderVelde, “The Anti-Republican Origins of the At-Will Doctrine.” See also Elizabeth Anderson, Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk About It). ↩︎
Angela Davis, Are Prisons Obsolete?; Prison Policy Initiative, “World Incarceration Rates If Every U.S. State Were A Country.” ↩︎
Akers Chacón & Davis, No One Is Illegal. ↩︎
Fred Magdoff et al., Hungry for Profit: The Agribusiness Threat to Farmers, Food, and the Environment. ↩︎
Dãnia Davy et al., “Black Agrarianism: Resistance”; David Bacon, In the Fields of the North/En los campos del norte; Gabriel Thompson, Chasing the Harvest: Migrant Workers in California Agriculture. ↩︎
Industrial growers in California played a prominent role in carrying forward the Southern pattern of reserving farm labor for workers of color, by securing labor pools made up of poor immigrants from the Global South. As Don Mitchell describes: “The decline of Chinese labor after 1882 put California Farmers in a dilemma. Without inexpensive, tractable labor, their farms could not be profitable in distant markets…. Farmers eventually turned to Japanese, Filipinos, Asian Indians, and, as we have seen, white men, families, women, children, Hispanics, Mexicans, and any other embodied bit of labor power they could get their hands on, adapting their theories of natural inferiority along the way to suit the specifics of the group in question. Racism thus intersected complexly with the demands of a ruthless agricultural system that…absolutely demanded huge numbers of highly marginalized workers” (The Lie of the Land, pp. 92-3). Growers’ WWII-era collaboration with state and federal government to establish the Bracero guestworker program was “decisive in cementing into place a particularly large-scale, industrialized form of agriculture dependent on highly exploitative labor processes,” a farming complex specifically predicated on ready access to workers from Mexico who could be deported at will (Mitchell, They Saved the Crops, p. 6). ↩︎
George Fitzhugh, quoted in Henry Nash Smith, Virgin Land: the American West as Symbol and Myth, p. 144. That “dependence” of “free society” on unfree workers is of course why farm and food workers earned the label “essential” during the pandemic; see Caroline Keegan, “Essential agriculture, sacrificial labor, and the COVID-19 pandemic in the US South”. ↩︎
Daniel Costa, “The Farmworker Wage Gap”; American Public Health Association, Improving Working Conditions for U.S. Farmworkers and Food Production Workers. Most farm employment is also highly season and entails regular unemployment: “At the peak of the 2000 season, [California] farms employed 509,000 people, which only accounted for between 50% and 60% of the farmworkers resident in the state. Such a huge surplus of labor certainly implies its constant cheapening” (Don Mitchell, “The Geography of Injustice,” p. 165). ↩︎
Hungry for Profit; Ritchie & Ristau, Crisis by Design: A Brief Review of US Farm Policy. ↩︎
Tracy Watson & Brad Wilson, “Two Hidden Histories of Rural Racial Solidarity Movements”; Donald Grubbs, Cry from the Cotton: The Southern Tenant Farmers’ Union and the New Deal; Mike Davis, Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the US Working Class; Philip Foner, Organized Labor and the Black Worker, 1619-1981. ↩︎
Daniel Martinez HoSang, A Wider Type of Freedom. ↩︎
Manning Marable, Race, Reform, and Rebellion: The Second Reconstruction in Black America, 1945-1990, p. 229. ↩︎
King, “A Testament of Hope,” p. 315. ↩︎
Marable, Race, Reform, and Rebellion, p. 228. ‘Political economy’ here refers to the economy as a realm not just of money but also of politics. ↩︎
Erik Olin Wright frequently used this game metaphor to describe different ways of thinking about social change, including in How to Be an Anti-Capitalist in the 21st Century. ↩︎
Du Bois, Black Reconstruction; Marable, Race, Reform, and Rebellion; Sabeel Rahman, “The Case for a Third Reconstruction.” ↩︎
Joseph Lowndes, From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism; James Goodwin, “Inside Project 2025.” ↩︎
Eric Foner subtitled his canonical history of Reconstruction “America’s Unfinished Revolution.” ↩︎
“[T]he border as it now exists: a fortified, heavily policed fence that pushes migrants into the deserts and mountains, and that plays such an important role in both lowering wages and undermining worker power in the U.S., is the exact geographical representation of the importance of geographical difference to continued capitalist development under the regime of free trade. The border reifies difference and makes it available as an input to profit. It helps reproduce the very differences that are leading so many migrants north and across the border. To undermine the border, to open it up to the free movement of workers, to allow workers the same freedoms and rights that are now being given to capital, would simultaneously undermine [the current regime of] U.S. production.” Mitchell, “The Geography of Injustice,” p. 161. ↩︎
La Via Campesina, “Food Sovereignty, a Manifesto for the Future of Our Planet”; Nyéléni Global Forum, Kandy Declaration. ↩︎